What ever happened to the Carbon Tax ?
Well something did , and it divided the nation . Share your view of what scientific and political elements undermined the effectiveness of the political campaign by completing the questionnaire. Please observe the categories - None of us like others speaking for us who don't practice or have the experience . I don't think the survey will teach us much ( God knows the country is littered with the rubbish they create), because few if any of us can claim much experience but I hope it might identify some patterns between science practitioners and others and other specific issues for some readers.
Share it with anyone who s genuinely concerned to help us use our resources better . ( We all know there are plenty of people out there who don't care and can kill a good and necessary idea in seconds . Clearly there are many Liberal party supporters who fit this category quite well )
Share it with anyone who s genuinely concerned to help us use our resources better . ( We all know there are plenty of people out there who don't care and can kill a good and necessary idea in seconds . Clearly there are many Liberal party supporters who fit this category quite well )
27th 5pm Thanks for your posts . Scientists are saying they didn't get heard enough and things aren't as clear as non scientists are saying they are. Any other observations
ReplyDelete15 responses 28th Non scientists are reluctant to blame political parties but Scientists clearly identify that political simplicities (100%)are even more sig than media simplicities(86%) ( strongest consensus areas)NS seem to focus on denial whereas scientists just doubt . This doubt S / no doubt (NS) is also reflected in a low support for Scientists opinions not being heard ( 16%NS) and a relative no show on reasons why the logic of either scientists or technologists is not showing up in "unconvincing" items. what i it about political and media storytelling that is so ineffective in the longer term?
ReplyDelete